<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://117.239.156.194:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/30">
    <title>DSpace Collection: Project Reports</title>
    <link>http://117.239.156.194:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/30</link>
    <description>Project Reports</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://117.239.156.194:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/73" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-01-04T08:40:06Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://117.239.156.194:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/73">
    <title>THE LOG OF GRAVITY</title>
    <link>http://117.239.156.194:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/73</link>
    <description>Title: THE LOG OF GRAVITY
Authors: Silva, Santos, Silvana Enreyro
Abstract: Although economists have long been aware of Jensen’s in-&#xD;
equality, many econometric applications have neglected an important&#xD;
implication of it: under heteroskedasticity, the parameters of log-&#xD;
linearized models estimated by OLS lead to biased estimates of the true&#xD;
elasticities. We explain why this problem arises and propose an appropri-&#xD;
ate estimator. Our criticism of conventional practices and the proposed&#xD;
solution extend to a broad range of applications where log-linearized&#xD;
equations are estimated. We develop the argument using one particular&#xD;
illustration, the gravity equation for trade. We find significant differences&#xD;
between estimates obtained with the proposed estimator and those ob-&#xD;
tained with the traditional method.</description>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

